Transfer customer settlement funds
Held by policy · P-12 · $80,000
Waiting on Priya Raman · 10:03
Workspace
Share the work, the context, and the next step.
Keep assignments, decisions, documents, and reviews together so the next person can pick up the work.
The brief sits in one tool, the task in another, and an agent works on someone’s laptop. Decisions get lost in threads. Reviewers must find the history before they can judge the result.
Example — fictional team and data. Not a live run or customer result.
Launch Operations · AES / Board
10:11
Before
Which version is accepted? Who reviewed it? Is approval complete?
After
One acceptance record.
Give each step a clear owner. Team members can follow agent updates and discuss changes beside the task.
Keep the brief, constraints, conversation, and latest outputs together. The next person or agent has a place to start without searching across threads.
Discuss the topic, task, or project where it belongs. Use supported connections such as Slack when the conversation starts in another tool.
Example — fictional team and data. Not a live run or customer result.
Plan
LiveCan we ship without copying customer data into the staging report?
Yes. The staging report now carries aggregate counts only. The raw export stays behind P-12 sign-off.
Use aggregate counts in staging.
AES-184 · P-12 · Claude Code
Keep drafts, specifications, code changes, and other outputs with the task. Review revisions and feedback where people and agents can find them.
A delivered result still needs review. See the brief, discussion, checks, and output together before you accept it or request changes.
Example — fictional team and data. Not a live run or customer result.
Review
Round 1| 82 | const report = createReport(); | |
| − | report.rows = rows; | |
| − | report.export = exportRaw(rows); | |
| 83 | + | report.count = rows.length; |
| 84 | + | report.byRegion = countBy(rows); |
| 85 | + | // raw export needs P-12 sign-off |
| 86 | + | report.export = null; |
| 87 | + | report.policy = "P-12"; |
| 88 | return report; |
Historyspec rev 4diff rev 7review round 1
An illustrative workflow shows people and agents adding to the same work record. Actual steps and timing depend on your process.
Example — fictional team and data. Not a live run or customer result.
One card, six steps
AES-18409:00
Goal set
Brief attached
PM connects the goal, brief, repo, and owner.
09:08
Spec drafted
Planning agent drafting spec
Planning agent drafts the spec; PM redirects scope.
09:24
Code written
Coding agent implementing
Coding agent starts from the shared brief and asks for detail where needed.
09:41
Checks run
Tests passed
Tests run; the policy in force is recorded on the run.
10:03
Reviewed & approved
Held for approval
Human gate · P-12
Reviewer gets the diff, requirement, checks, and history.
10:11
Shipped & learned
Accepted
Outcome, cost, and acceptance are recorded for later comparison.
A shared brief and decision history can reduce the time spent explaining the same task again.
Requirements and feedback in one place can help reviewers focus on the result.
A visible owner and next step can reduce follow-ups across tools.
We already have a tracker with AI features.
Keep your tracker. Aestus adds the run, artifact, policy, review, cost, and acceptance record needed when people and agents share the work.