Orchestration
Build, test, and run agentic workflows.
Give workflow owners a visual path from draft to governed release.
Define the steps, choose the workers and tools, add approval points, inspect a dry run, and publish a named version.
A prompt is not an operating process.
Real work needs context, steps, tools, exceptions, approvals, retries, outputs, and a clear finish. When all of that lives only in code or a chat thread, the people who own the work cannot see it or change it safely.
- of agentic AI projects expected to be canceled by end of 2027
- >40%
- of organizations report agents acting outside their intended scope
- 80%
Example — fictional team and data. Not a live run or customer result.
Workflow builder · Launch Operations
Ship the governed customer import
Rev 14Policy checked- Start
Customer import goal
Customer import goal brief
MCMaya Chen09:00Completed - Agent
Draft the spec
Governed customer import spec
Aestus Planning09:08Completed - Agent
Write the import
PR #184 · customer import
Claude Code09:24Completed - Quality check
Run the checks
Import validation report
Aestus Review09:41Completed - P-12 · ApprovalBranch
P-12 · Funds transfer sign-off
transfer.create · hold for sign-off
transfer.create · sign-offNo transfer · continue10:03Approved - Deliver
Release the import
customer-import-v1.0.0 · Accepted
MCMaya Chen10:11Accepted
Turn the process into a visible graph.
Define each step
Choose an agent, branch, quality check, approval, decision, interview, or deliver node.
Connect the needed systems
Add supported tools and repositories, then keep their access tied to the workspace and task.
Inspect before release
Use validation and dry-run evidence to see the planned path, calls, and policy holds before a live run.
Example — fictional team and data. Not a live run or customer result.
Connected systems
Ship the governed customer import
- Claude Code · Coding agentWrote PR #18409:24
- GitHub · RepositoryPR #184 opened · meridian/customer-import09:24
- Slack · Approval channelP-12 sign-off request · Priya Raman10:03
- MCP · MCP clientCard lifecycle · read, claim, update, releaseconnected
Keep release and runtime controls together.
Name the decision owner
Add named approval and choice steps where the work needs a person. Keep the decision and reason with the run.
Release a known version
Review the graph diff, validation state, policy evidence, and candidate hash before promotion.
Pin the runtime boundary
Each run records the workflow release and active policy boundary used to allow, hold, or stop supported actions.
Example — fictional team and data. Not a live run or customer result.
Dry-run report
Ship the governed customer import
rev 14AES-184
01Goal set
Would runMCMaya Chenwould read the goal brief
est. 0:20 · 8 credits
02Spec drafted
Would runAestus Planningwould write the import spec
est. 8:00 · 14 credits
03Code written
Would runClaude Codewould call GitHub · open PR #184
est. 16:00 · 9 credits
04Checks run
Would runAestus Reviewwould call GitHub · run the checks
est. 17:00 · 7 credits
05Reviewed & approved
Would holdPRPriya Ramanwould hold for sign-off under P-12
Every transfer.create call waits for Priya Raman
waits · 10 credits
06Shipped & learned
Would runMCMaya Chenwould call Slack · accept customer-import-v1.0.0
est. 8:00 · 7 credits
Catch known problems before release.
A graph, access grant, or missing approval can be reviewed before the workflow goes on duty. Runtime controls still matter because a sound configuration cannot prevent every bad input or tool result. Aestus keeps both moments in the same release record.
- of breached organizations lacked AI access controls
- 97%
- had no AI governance policy
- 63%
- added breach cost from shadow AI
- $670K
The numbers this page owns.
- Time from idea to a governed, running workflow
- Elapsed time from first draft to an approved production version.
- Violations caught before launch
- Release-blocking findings resolved before a live run.
We already have an agent builder.
Keep it. Aestus connects the agent to shared work, release history, policy, approvals, artifacts, cost, and acceptance.