Skip to main content

Orchestration

Make the workflow clear.

Bring people, agents, and approvals into one visible process.

Arrange steps visually, connect supported tools, and preview the plan before you run it.

An agent needs a process around it.

Once an agent is built, the team still needs to decide what it should do, which information it needs, and when a person should step in. A shared workflow makes those choices easier to discuss and review.

of agentic AI projects expected to be canceled by end of 2027
>40%
of organizations report agents acting outside their intended scope
80%
Gartner, 2025 · SailPoint, 2025

Inspect the workflow before it runs.

Select a step to see what it can read or change. Fix the broad grant before the draft starts.

Illustrative example

Draft the update

Write a customer update from the brief. The model cannot approve or send it.

Estimated step cost
$2.40
Repository access
All repositories
Warning
Task access

The tool grant covers more repositories than this task needs.

Draft customer update

Current access
All repositories
Required access
Refund repository

Try the example. Changes stay in this demo.

Make the workflow clear before it starts.

  • Design and adjust the steps visually

    Choose the work, its participants, and the reviews it needs. Workflow owners can see the process and change supported steps without writing code.

  • Connect the needed systems

    Use supported agents, models, repositories, and business tools. Review each connection’s access and setup needs before adding it to the workflow.

  • Preview the planned work

    Use a dry run to inspect the expected steps and approval needs. A preview can reveal gaps, but live results still need review.

Example — fictional team and data. Not a live run or customer result.

Example connections

Ship the governed customer import

4 connected
  • Claude Code · Coding agentWrote PR #18409:24
  • GitHub · RepositoryPR #184 opened · meridian/customer-import09:24
  • Slack · Approval channelP-12 sign-off request · Priya Raman10:03
  • MCP · MCP clientCard lifecycle · read, claim, update, releaseconnected
Access scoped to Launch Operations · AES-184

Match approvals to the way your team works.

  • Name the decision owner

    Choose who reviews sensitive steps and outputs. Keep their decision and reason with the work, so the next participant can see what was agreed.

  • Review changes before release

    Check the proposed changes, access needs, and review results before putting a new version into use.

  • Keep controls in place during the work

    Supported actions can proceed, wait for approval, or stop under your rules. Coverage depends on the tools and execution mode in use.

Example — fictional team and data. Not a live run or customer result.

Example dry-run report

Ship the governed customer import

rev 14AES-184

  1. 01Goal set

    Would run

    MCMaya Chenwould read the goal brief

    est. 0:20 · 8 credits

  2. 02Spec drafted

    Would run

    Aestus Planningwould write the import spec

    est. 8:00 · 14 credits

  3. 03Code written

    Would run

    Claude Codewould call GitHub · open PR #184

    est. 16:00 · 9 credits

  4. 04Checks run

    Would run

    Aestus Reviewwould call GitHub · run the checks

    est. 17:00 · 7 credits

  5. 05Reviewed & approved

    Would hold

    PRPriya Ramanwould hold for sign-off under P-12

    Every transfer.create call waits for Priya Raman

    waits · 10 credits

  6. 06Shipped & learned

    Would run

    MCMaya Chenwould call Slack · accept customer-import-v1.0.0

    est. 8:00 · 7 credits

6 steps · 1 gate · est. 55 credits· 0 side effects

Start live run

Look for problems while they are easier to change.

Review access, spending limits, and approval needs before release. This may help your team catch problems earlier. Checks during live work still matter; a preview cannot rule out every risk.

of organizations with AI-related breaches lacked proper AI access controls
97%
of surveyed organizations lacked AI governance policies
63%
higher average breach cost with high shadow AI use versus low or no use
$670K
IBM, 2025

Measure the path from idea to useful work.

Time from idea to a governed, running workflow
Elapsed time from first draft to an approved production version.
Violations caught before launch
Release-blocking findings resolved before a live run.

We already have an agent builder.

An existing builder can remain part of your setup. Aestus gives supported agents a shared workspace with goals, human reviews, costs, and results to help your team manage the wider process.

Explore one workflow with clear steps and approvals.

Talk to us