Skip to main content

Orchestration

Build, test, and run agentic workflows.

Give workflow owners a visual path from draft to governed release.

Define the steps, choose the workers and tools, add approval points, inspect a dry run, and publish a named version.

A prompt is not an operating process.

Real work needs context, steps, tools, exceptions, approvals, retries, outputs, and a clear finish. When all of that lives only in code or a chat thread, the people who own the work cannot see it or change it safely.

of agentic AI projects expected to be canceled by end of 2027
>40%
of organizations report agents acting outside their intended scope
80%
Gartner, 2025 · SailPoint, 2025

Example — fictional team and data. Not a live run or customer result.

Workflow builder · Launch Operations

Ship the governed customer import

Rev 14Policy checked
AES-RUN-184Accepted 10:11
  1. Start

    Customer import goal

    Customer import goal brief

    MCMaya Chen
    09:00Completed
  2. Agent

    Draft the spec

    Governed customer import spec

    Aestus Planning
    09:08Completed
  3. Agent

    Write the import

    PR #184 · customer import

    Claude Code
    09:24Completed
  4. Quality check

    Run the checks

    Import validation report

    Aestus Review
    09:41Completed
  5. P-12 · Approval
    Branch

    P-12 · Funds transfer sign-off

    transfer.create · hold for sign-off

    transfer.create · sign-offNo transfer · continue
    10:03Approved
  6. Deliver

    Release the import

    customer-import-v1.0.0 · Accepted

    MCMaya Chen
    10:11Accepted

Turn the process into a visible graph.

  • Define each step

    Choose an agent, branch, quality check, approval, decision, interview, or deliver node.

  • Connect the needed systems

    Add supported tools and repositories, then keep their access tied to the workspace and task.

  • Inspect before release

    Use validation and dry-run evidence to see the planned path, calls, and policy holds before a live run.

Example — fictional team and data. Not a live run or customer result.

Connected systems

Ship the governed customer import

4 connected
  • Claude Code · Coding agentWrote PR #18409:24
  • GitHub · RepositoryPR #184 opened · meridian/customer-import09:24
  • Slack · Approval channelP-12 sign-off request · Priya Raman10:03
  • MCP · MCP clientCard lifecycle · read, claim, update, releaseconnected
Access scoped to Launch Operations · AES-184

Keep release and runtime controls together.

  • Name the decision owner

    Add named approval and choice steps where the work needs a person. Keep the decision and reason with the run.

  • Release a known version

    Review the graph diff, validation state, policy evidence, and candidate hash before promotion.

  • Pin the runtime boundary

    Each run records the workflow release and active policy boundary used to allow, hold, or stop supported actions.

Example — fictional team and data. Not a live run or customer result.

Dry-run report

Ship the governed customer import

rev 14AES-184

  1. 01Goal set

    Would run

    MCMaya Chenwould read the goal brief

    est. 0:20 · 8 credits

  2. 02Spec drafted

    Would run

    Aestus Planningwould write the import spec

    est. 8:00 · 14 credits

  3. 03Code written

    Would run

    Claude Codewould call GitHub · open PR #184

    est. 16:00 · 9 credits

  4. 04Checks run

    Would run

    Aestus Reviewwould call GitHub · run the checks

    est. 17:00 · 7 credits

  5. 05Reviewed & approved

    Would hold

    PRPriya Ramanwould hold for sign-off under P-12

    Every transfer.create call waits for Priya Raman

    waits · 10 credits

  6. 06Shipped & learned

    Would run

    MCMaya Chenwould call Slack · accept customer-import-v1.0.0

    est. 8:00 · 7 credits

6 steps · 1 gate · est. 55 credits· 0 side effects

Start live run

Catch known problems before release.

A graph, access grant, or missing approval can be reviewed before the workflow goes on duty. Runtime controls still matter because a sound configuration cannot prevent every bad input or tool result. Aestus keeps both moments in the same release record.

of breached organizations lacked AI access controls
97%
had no AI governance policy
63%
added breach cost from shadow AI
$670K
IBM, 2025

The numbers this page owns.

Time from idea to a governed, running workflow
Elapsed time from first draft to an approved production version.
Violations caught before launch
Release-blocking findings resolved before a live run.

We already have an agent builder.

Keep it. Aestus connects the agent to shared work, release history, policy, approvals, artifacts, cost, and acceptance.

Build one governed workflow.

Talk to us